Moin! On 30 Jun 2015, at 14:30, Romeo Zwart wrote:
Dear colleagues,
The RIPE NCC holds a number of domains besides ripe.net.
Some of these domains were only registered as a "protection" mechanism, which was considered good practice at the time. Is this considered bad practice now? Was there a policy change I missed?
We now plan to release the following domains, which are not being actively used by the RIPE NCC:
ripe-ncc.org ripe-ncc.com ripe-ncc.net ripencc.com ripencc.net ripencc.org ripelabs.net ripen.cc ripe.int ipv6roadshow.com ipv6roadshow.net ipv6roadshow.org So we are talking about 12 domains. What is the hassle of keeping them? I'm pretty "confident" the new owners won't do as good things with it as the RIPE NCC.
I would like to see more reasoning behind why you don't want to serve these 12 domains any longer. So long -Ralf