Brad Knowles wrote:
Distribution of RIPE-area TLDs across a robust set of servers that are geographically diverse, and making this a "Best Current Practice" advocated by the WG, and then taking the next step and making this an actual RIPE requirement (and something that RIPE NCC
what do you mean by "RIPE requirement" in this context? I do not see any means by which the NCC, the WG or RIPE could or should try to "enforce" anything in that field. Anyway, the NCC already contributes to this BCP by providing DNS secondary service for TLDs (even more recently). The aspect of topological diversity is approached by the ``shared secondary servers(?)'' project, which I think is led by DE-NIC under the umbrella of CENTR. So, should we try to learn more about these efforts? -Peter