13 Nov
2014
13 Nov
'14
9:28 p.m.
On Nov 13, 2014, at 7:44 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
I'd rather not see the RIPE NCC further endorse the DLV technology and service by continuing to submit key material there.
thank you
DLV was meant as a temporary deployment aid and might have been a good idea at its time.
or not
randy
+1 On Nov 13, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> wrote:
The NCC should simply release ripe.int, as the historical reasons for it no longer apply. (FWIW, same goes for apnic.int. None of the other RIRs have similar domains.)
+1 Regards, -drc