On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:32:55AM +0100, Stephen Burley wrote:
Stephen,
I'm not sure to what extent the hostmaster function of the NCC provides the cycles to make the WG go.
My impression is that the majority of the work comes from the members, the chairs, and non-directly-registration-related NCC staff. Hence my contention would be that an expanded charter will not change the wait-queue time.
Niall
I would just like to remind all that the more RIPE/NCC get diversified in their focus, the less gets done in the areas that realy matter to us. I am not disagreeing with the outline i just feel we need to evaluate how much of what is discussed at the meetings is IP relavent. We can not complain at
As i said in the email i am not against the charter i just wanted to clarify that we will not take resources from the NCC like the Test Traffic white elephant did (though i am sure Daniel would disagree ;). Stephen Burley WorldCom EMEA Hostmaster SB855-RIPE ----- Original Message ----- From: "Niall Richard Murphy" <niallm-ripe@enigma.ie> To: "Stephen Burley" <stephenb@uk.uu.net> Cc: <dns-wg@ripe.net> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:11 PM Subject: Re: New draft charter for the RIPE DNS WG the
NCC about high wait times on requests if we the community are distracting the NCC with none core function projects and fact finding.
-- Enigma Consulting Limited: Security, UNIX and telecommunications consultants. Address: Floor 2, 45 Dawson Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. http://www.enigma.ie/