On Tuesday, 21 Jan 1997, Christophe Wolfhugel writes:
> Marcel Schneider:
>> IMHO: Your answer is insufficient if not entirely mistaken. The inhabitants
>> of central and southern Europe have a right to the same kind of connectivity
>> as the northern region is now trying to get hold of or already has done
>> so. Make no sense to improve an already good situation.
> What about having the Europeans to work towards moving the center of
> Europe from the US East coast to some European point ?
> As long as European major connectivity providers are ignoring each other
> and having their best interconnection points being MAE-East or the NY Nap
> all this seems useless to me...
> (that was an end user's point of view -- intra Europe networking is not
> usable today for people who work, at least those not in scandinavian areas).
> So for us, London, Stockholm, NY, Washington, Geneva, Milano, etc... that
> root server will mainly be unrechable :(.
> The location of that server is not a technical issue, it's a political one.
Agreements, policies. Also my (personal) opinion. But as long
as Peter Lothberg <roll(a)Stupi.SE> et al are attempting to tell us
'route your inter-European IP packets over the US' nothing will improve.
The owners of 150+ MB links to the US can easily sell this opinion,
but it is absurd.
> --
> Christophe Wolfhugel -+- SIS, Institut Pasteur, Paris
> Boulot : wolf(a)pasteur.fr, $HOME : wolf(a)schnok.fr.net
Marcel
