Disagree. If someone violates the CoC in their presentation, they should be given an opportunity to remove the offending material and re-upload. Likewise, if there's a video recording of someone being racist/sexist/homophobic/harrasing (for example), the video should either be removed or have the offending content edited out.I consider this absolutely not ready for a consensus call. It introduces a new process with grave sanctions including
“Removing a presentation and video archive from the meeting website”
This is nothing new. We already state this in the T&Cs for the RIPE Meeting that all attendees agree to in the registration process.
“Requiring that the violator leave the meeting/social immediately without a refund (as per the RIPE Meeting Terms and Conditions)”
This was discussed on Friday with HPH - I'll be adding some text in here re: Appeal...as well as incorporating the rest of his feedback.
“Banning attendance for future meetings (in the case of repeated violations, violence and extreme violations)”
Yet there is no mention at all of appeal, review or redress. This is not the way the RIPE community should operate.
Yes, have already discussed this and that is the plan.I also suggest to have the language reviewed by the NCC legal team for legality and precision
before considering a consensus call.
Thanks,Daniel
On 30 Aug 2019, at 13:13, Amanda Gowland wrote:
Thanks Hans Petter,
Let me work the final few comments into the draft, and then I'll poke some of the others to make sure they're happy for us to do that.
Amanda
On 30/08/2019 11:07, Hans Petter Holen wrote:b) We can ask HPH to declare consensus + open the call for volunteers
Let me know when you are ready for me to do the last call for consensus on the RIPE list.
Maybe you also want a time-slot in the Community Plenary on Thursday.
Hans Petter_______________________________________________
diversity mailing list
diversity@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity