The function is very different, but the concept of a neutral, stable, respected panel of volunteers serving the community's interests is not so different from the existing arrangements for the RIPE NCC Arbiters' panel. It might be worth a look at the relevant documents in case there's anything in there that could be incorporated to save effort defining processes/structure, to make the CoC Team parameters more "RIPE-like", and/or that might otherwise be overlooked. Keith On 8/5/19 8:15 AM, Amanda Gowland wrote:
Please find attached a draft proposal for the CoC Team: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yqOUPR02SONuSt812cuOBkk_xnhjYzjdk9qmsJkc...
I used Sasha's draft as the framework for the doc, just adding/editing where necessary.
There are some to-be-determined factors, mainly:
- How long should a term be for volunteers?> - How many people (minimum, maximum) should we aim for?> - What is the time-frame for response (e.g. how long would a reporter need to wait for a confirmation of receipt from the team?)
Please add your comments.
Kind regards,
Amanda