Hi, Just to let you know: The archives have been deleted and the mailing list is now open for everyone to subscribe (and the new archives will be public). I suggest we wait until we have that RIPE Labs article ready before we promote the list more? That way people have something to talk about and to volunteer for :-) Mirjam On 17/05/17 15:30, Leslie wrote:
Sounds perfect to me!
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet@heanet.ie> wrote: Cool.
And I think a blog post would be wonderful.
Brian
Brian Nisbet Network Operations Manager HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network 1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland +35316609040 brian.nisbet@heanet.ie www.heanet.ie Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270
On 17/05/2017 09:40, Mirjam Kuehne wrote:
Hi all,
So, I think we are in agreement to:
- open up the list so that people can subscribe - delete the archives
Anything else?
Vesna suggested to write a blog post for RIPE Labs that we can then use to promote this the activity, the task force and the mailing list.
Cheers, Mirjam
On 17/05/17 10:05, Shane Kerr wrote:
Vesna,
[ warning: transparency advocate speaking ]
At 2017-05-15 14:08:12 +0200 Vesna Manojlovic <BECHA@ripe.net> wrote:
Hi,
On 15/05/17 13:01, Brian Nisbet wrote: > Afternoon, > > I'll admit I was hoping we could keep this list as the > taskforce internal list, while opening up the membership of > the taskforce.
(but how would the taskforce communicate then?!?!)
So...
Shall we open _another_ list, called "diversity-list@ripe.net", and make that completely open - open subscription, open=public archives..
.. and then see what do we send there, and what do we send to *this* smaller list; and if one or the other becomes redundant in a year, we close one..
Otherwise, I am ready to get our techies to do whatever we agree: - clean up the archives - open the existing list to subscription - re-publish the archives...
I'd rather just wipe the archives and start fresh. "Cleaning the archives" is always going to be tricky, both time-consuming and error-prone. I don't see any strong requirement to preserve the previous discussion.
If we need a closed list then we can set up diversity-cabal@ripe.net, diversilluminati@ripe.net something like that (akin to the ${WG}-chairs@ripe.net lists for RIPE working groups).
But honestly I think we are dangerously close to having the mindset of a small group of activists who are doing things for or to the community rather than being merely the most active folks in a larger group of like-minded people. Having a closed list strengthens that way of thinking.
Lets just be open and if we have problems we can figure out what to do, like Leslie said in a separate mail.
Cheers,
-- Shane
_______________________________________________ Diversity mailing list Diversity@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity
_______________________________________________ Diversity mailing list Diversity@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity
_______________________________________________ Diversity mailing list Diversity@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity
_______________________________________________ Diversity mailing list Diversity@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity