Hi Brian
Afternoon, On 07/07/2017 16:22, Malcolm Hutty wrote:Hi Leo, On 07/07/2017 15:16, Leo Vegoda wrote:I know that there was some pushback against measurements and targets. However, I think it is impossible to make progress unless you measure and have a goal to work towards. As such, I would strongly support a set of diversity measurements based around a number of key criteria: - Age - Gender - National origin and/or country of residenceI think your idea of "progress" presumes the answer. If you believe the goal is - as one participant espoused - to increase the level of female participation until 50% of RIPE participants are female (or more?), then measuring progress against this target is likely to help achieve it.More than one. It's a great goal.However, if you believe that even having such a target is inappropriate, divisive and (frankly) another form of bigotry, and that the appropriate action from RIPE is to ensure that all participants are welcomed and respected regardless of their sex, then establishing such measurements pushes us down the wrong track. It also diverts attention from what should actually be done.Well, a) how can espousing that things like the operation of the Internet should involve a relatively even split of humanity be divisive? I don't understand the objection here. But also, we can do more than one thing at a time. We can measure *and* welcome. But equally we should be encouraging and enabling, not just welcoming.