RE: [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
Sorry about the delay in response, I'm in Kyoto at the moment, 9 hours ahead (or 15 hours behind in email terms). Niall O'Reilly wrote:
Shane,
Good stuff.
I believe that what you describe matches the consensus we reached.
On 16 Feb 2005, at 16:44, Shane Kerr wrote:
The changes we propose are:
o To hide attributes that contain e-mail addresses in the default output of queries. We will also provide an option to disable this feature,
Fine.
Yes, we agreed this.
o To add a new "abuse-mailbox:" attribute to PERSON, ROLE, IRT, MNTNER, ORGANISATION, INETNUM, and INET6NUM objects,
Fine.
We did *not* agree this. We agreed to add the abuse-mailbox attribute to IRT, PERSON and ROLE objects. We specifically decided not to add it to the INETNUM and INET6NUM objects (although this wasn't minuted) and we didn't mention ORGANISATION objects at all. See AP49.4.
o To provide an option to display only key attributes and abuse contacts,
Fine.
Nice idea.
o To change the IRT object template so that the "signature:" and "encryption:" attributes are no longer mandatory,
Fine.
Fine
o To change the behaviour of the '-c' switch in whois queries.
No opinion, but that's my fault. 8-)
Fine
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly University College Dublin Computing Services
PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net) Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9
-- Nigel Titley Peering Coordinator, FLAG Telecom +44 20 8564 5812 ********************************************************************** This e-mail message is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and contains information which is or may be confidential, non-public or legally privileged. Any dissemination or distribution of this message other than to its intended recipient is strictly prohibited. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose the contents to any other person. If you have received this message in error, please notify us by email to postmaster@flagtelecom.com immediately and delete the original message and all copies from all locations in your computer systems. This e-mail has been swept by Mailsweeper TM for viruses. However, FLAG Telecom cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses. ********************************************************************** This message has been scanned for viruses by MailControl - www.mailcontrol.com
On 23 Feb 2005, at 01:06, Titley, Nigel wrote:
We specifically decided not to add it to the INETNUM and INET6NUM objects (although this wasn't minuted)
Really? I'm flabbergasted. Best regards, Niall O'Reilly University College Dublin Computing Services PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net) Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9
participants (3)
-
Niall O'Reilly
-
Randy Bush
-
Titley, Nigel