At 3:10 PM -0400 23/8/02, Curtis Villamizar wrote:

It is possible to reactivate a WG on the mailing list only, for the purpose of updating an existing RFC and not having a meeting. This was done with TCPLW for RFC1323. Cengiz would need to update RPSL (as primary author and keeper of the source of that document).

Is the only change needed at this point the :: notation to indicate external repository? If so, no change is needed to RFC-2622 since the :: notation is called for in RFC-2725 and it wouldn't be worth updating RFC-2622 just for that.

What you really need to do is get Larry Blunk to update the ISI tools.

Curtis, I wasn't the person suggesting making changes, I was just suggesting that you needed to follow a procedure in order to make it happen and couldn't just "fix" it in software. I would suggest if people think this is a good idea (and I haven't really thought about it) then perhaps merging it into the RPSLng work would be the way to go. Mark.