RE: [db-wg] Draft Minutes of the RIPE 52 DB-WG meeting
            
            
            
                4 May
                
                    2006
                
            
            
                4 May
                
                '06
                
            
            
            
        
    
                1:13 p.m.
            
        No, after Manchester the agreement was to return the irt record relevant to the queried ip/network. This is subtly different from the behaviour of -c, which may return a less specific inetnum object if the irt record is referenced by it.
And this, if I recall correctly was, at the heart of the argument in Istanbul Nigel
        7124
        
      
          Age (days ago)
        
      
        7124
        
    
          Last active (days ago)
        
        
        
        0 comments
    
    
        
        1 participants
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    participants (1)
- 
                
Nigel Titley