Re: [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
6 Feb
2004
6 Feb
'04
7:28 p.m.
On 6 Feb 2004, at 17:18, Randy Bush wrote:
not when you are using it as a reason to affect decisions in this discussion, i.e. allowing email addresses in abuse-c:
Not me! Something must have gotten lost in translation. My picture is that the RHS of abuse-c: is a handle, while the RHS of abuse-mailbox: is an RFC822 addr-spec. Niall
7650
Age (days ago)
7650
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Niall O'Reilly