In checking through the minutes and actions I note an action [AP48.3] on myself to clarify the issue of tech-c on the proposed poem: object. My proposal is that to be consistent we should have the tech-c attribute on both the Poem: and the Poetic-form: object. I also note Ulrich's suggestion that we should add the mnt-irt attribute to the Poem: object in order to provide a means of reporting abuse of (or by) the poem, and agree that this could be useful. Hopefully its inclusion at this early stage of the proceedings will allow tool-writers to make use of it rather than parsing lists of changed: attributes. I don't think we need the irt-mnt attribute on the Poetic-form object, but I'm willing to be persuaded. Please could I have comments on this, with the hope that we can tie off this action in Manchester, and get the new objects into the database. Best regards Nigel -- Nigel Titley Peering Coordinator, FLAG Telecom +44 20 7478 9579 ********************************************************************** This e-mail message is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and contains information which is or may be confidential, non-public or legally privileged. Any dissemination or distribution of this message other than to its intended recipient is strictly prohibited. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose the contents to any other person. If you have received this message in error, please notify us by email to postmaster@flagtelecom.com immediately and delete the original message and all copies from all locations in your computer systems. This e-mail has been swept by Mailsweeper TM for viruses. However, FLAG Telecom cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses. ********************************************************************** This message has been scanned for viruses by MailControl - www.mailcontrol.com