13 Nov
2017
13 Nov
'17
12:16 p.m.
On 13/11/17 21:36, Job Snijders wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Mark Prior <mrp@mrp.net> wrote:
In this particular case I would suggest that you do want the tool to complain rather than ignore the new rp-attribute.
Why would you break backwards compatibility?
It's only broken if you include a large community formatted string in your policy and your tool doesn't support it. In that case I would like the script to break rather than load a broken configuration to a router that potentially causes chaos. Mark.