7 Jul
2021
7 Jul
'21
11:27 p.m.
Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote on 07/07/2021 15:44:
I think that AS23456 should be excluded as I can't think of any good reason for having such a route object and seemingly no one else either as there are none currently.
at one point years ago, before asn32s-capable software was widely available, it occasionally made sense to encode AS23456 in various objects. These days, there is no reason for it, and it would be better if AS23456 didn't appear in IRR objects. This brings up Niall's point about making sure that objects like this can't reappear if they're deleted. Nick