10 Mar
2003
10 Mar
'03
11:01 a.m.
On 2003-03-10 15:47:51 +1000, Sanjaya wrote:
1. I just want to point out that the example is not exactly correct? 192.168.201.0/24 is not more specific than 192.168.101.0/24. They don't even overlap ;-)
Yikes! I guess that should be 192.168.0.0/16. :(
2. Just to confirm my understanding: the successful creation of a more specific inetnum will trigger a notification to all mnt-nfy: of the parent block's mnt-lower(s). Is this correct?
That is correct, and a *failed* creation of a more specific inetnum will trigger notification to all "upd-to:" of the same maintainers. -- Shane Kerr RIPE NCC