25 Nov
2014
25 Nov
'14
12:46 a.m.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:35:56AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
Correct route object prefix length, wrong origin & visible in BGP DFZ: is this not legitimate in a make before break origin transfer? of course, many will forget to clean old up afterward. I have not attempted to figure out why those route objects are there.
is there a second route: object for the same prefix which is correct?
Quickly ran something for IPv4: {'AFRINIC': 99, 'APNIC': 10, 'ARIN': 112, 'LACNIC': 1, 'RIPE': 6200} This means there are 99 objects which fall within AfriNIC administrated space which have an origin not seen in the DFZ, but a _correct_ route object already exists. Kind regards, Job