-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi db-wg and routing-wg,
Can I encourage those that have an opinion about this to voice it? The NCC would like some confirmation from the community that there is some demand to implement this (and no objection to doing it).
The only feedback since that message has been from Nick who, if I may summarise, said that he didn't object, it may serve some use, but this creates an ugly (but inevitable) fork in RPSL. There was mild support before RIPE 67, and the NCC have asked if we can now declare consensus and move on. My interpretation is "yes." Cheers, Rob -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlKp2GQACgkQF83fs8P8zalp7wCfbMI6Cr1/kIZ+u1ZvTERaVjha BJkAn3x+GTjxrq9EE3AZvzPnlkt5ceJz =MEex -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----