In message <46AAC114-7B46-4D17-A024-56E82872797C@ripe.net>, Edward Shryane <eshryane@ripe.net> wrote:
(It is a curious oddity that the NRO stats file is apparently not quite a perfect representation of the sum total of those 5 files.)
I'm using the RIR delegated stats as they are already in use by Whois...
As of now, I am also. (The NRO status file contains *many* divergences from the sum of the 5 RIR status files. IT is apparent that some of these, at least, are caused by "version skew", i.e. the NRO stats file is apparently not as fresh as what can be gotten from the 5 RIRs directly.)
It seems quite entirely half fast for you/NCC to be doing all of this work to eliminate JUST the bogus route objects that reference bogon IP address space, while leaving alone all of the route objects that refer to bogon ASNs.
I mean, is it just me, or isn't that obvious?
We can extend the cleanup job to also validate the origin AS, if the rules are clear and if the DB-WG agrees.
Wouldn't it make your task easier if you were to tackle both of these sets of bogus route objects at the same time, rather than processing each set sequentially? I'm just saying that I think it would be Good to move forward with deleting both sets of bogus route objects ASAP. (I mean it's all garbage anyway, and I really doubt that anyone is going to miss any of this gunk.)
Thanks, that was my question, should we validate that *either* the IP or AS is unregistered, or *both* IP and AS are unregistered (and you indicated *either*).
I have made my own personal preference clear. What do others on the list think? Regards, rfg