11 Aug
2017
11 Aug
'17
3:13 a.m.
That has proven to never really be an issue. When a network upstream of another network says they don't support additional databases for IRR, so far that has always proven to actually mean they've never needed to think about supporting multiple databases, and never had the demand to do the work to change that.
In other words, it's not that they *can't* support other databases. It's that they never have, and it's just the "way things have been done". It's always ended up that they *can* support multiple databases if asked to.
when negotiating with a prospective peer, i would rather not add "you will have to change operational practice and code for this to work." randy