20 Aug
2024
20 Aug
'24
2:11 p.m.
I think this is something that can be improved. I suggest implementing the option to force-delete a route(6) object as ASN resource holder. This saves both the resource holder and RIPE NCC valuable time.
Wessel Sandkuijl wrote on 20/08/2024 12:51: there's definitely an issue here, but I wonder if the authorisation model is opened up a bit, whether that would open up a can of worms (e.g. if you can auth a delete, why shouldn't you be able auth a create?). Would someone from the RIPE NCC be able to provide some suggestions about how this situation could be addressed? Nick