On 07-Mar-2016, at 3:00 PM, Gilles Massen <gilles.massen@restena.lu> wrote:
On 07/03/16 10:23, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
As a reporter of quite a lot of phish - I think having something that is standardized and machine parseable helps.
Those that really don’t want to handle reports for a range might want to populate something standard there too (and yes, this is a semi ironic policy proposal) - devnull@example.com or whatever.
"no abuse-c found" looks pretty machine parsable to me.
I might even agree with you, if abuse-c was actually standardized and if abuse contacts weren’t spread across a variety of other fields - such as the remarks. remarks: +---------------------------------------+ remarks: | In case of complaints use the contact | remarks: | information in the role object below. | remarks: +---------------------------------------+