[Input to DB-WG] Flagging this result as 'SUCCESS' is unhelpful. I regard this as a bug, and a silly one too. [Question to ripe-dbm] So how am I supposed to delete redundant objects and keep the DB clean ? Best Niall O'Reilly On Friday, Sep 12, 2003, at 08:26 Europe/Dublin, ripe-dbm@ripe.net wrote:
From: "Niall O'Reilly" <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie> Subject: Bulk deletion of /24 detail Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:26:41 +0100 Reply-To: Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie Message-ID: <7484C0E0-E4F2-11D7-A9BD-000393DA759C@ucd.ie>
SUMMARY OF UPDATE:
Number of objects found: 0 Number of objects processed successfully: 0 Create: 0 Modify: 0 Delete: 0 No Operation: 0 Number of objects processed with errors: 0 Create: 0 Modify: 0 Delete: 0 Syntax Errors: 0
DETAILED EXPLANATION:
***Warning: Invalid keyword(s) found: Bulk, deletion, of, /24, detail ***Warning: All keywords were ignored
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The following paragraph(s) do not look like objects and were NOT PROCESSED:
inetnum: 193.1.128.0 - 193.1.128.255 netname: UCD-193-1-128-19-128 delete: aggregated into UCD-193-1-128-19
inetnum: 193.1.129.0 - 193.1.129.255 netname: UCD-193-1-128-19-129 delete: aggregated into UCD-193-1-128-19
inetnum: 193.1.130.0 - 193.1.130.255 netname: UCD-193-1-128-19-130 delete: aggregated into UCD-193-1-128-19
inetnum: 193.1.131.0 - 193.1.131.255 netname: UCD-193-1-128-19-131 delete: aggregated into UCD-193-1-128-19
inetnum: 193.1.133.0 - 193.1.133.255 netname: UCD-193-1-128-19-133 delete: aggregated into UCD-193-1-128-19
inetnum: 193.1.137.0 - 193.1.137.255 netname: UCD-OLDBAR-LHS delete: aggregated into UCD-193-1-128-19
inetnum: 193.1.138.0 - 193.1.138.255 netname: UCD-OLDBAR-RHS delete: aggregated into UCD-193-1-128-19
inetnum: 193.1.139.0 - 193.1.139.255 netname: UCD-MICROSTORE delete: aggregated into UCD-193-1-128-19
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For assistance or clarification please contact: RIPE Database Administration <ripe-dbm@ripe.net>