I don't personally think this is a good basis to not have information in the public view. The wider community is entitled to have a path to identify who controls and operates this class of asset. The burden of spam cleaning is a cost which. has to be borne by the holder in the public interest.

I realise there are other threats in this. I'm not arguing there are no downside risks to PII being associated with address management records, just that I do not think "but you will get spam" is not a strong enough reason to exclude it.

(ex RIR staffer now contractor)

-G