6 May
2004
6 May
'04
5:18 p.m.
On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 17:12, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
Why do you not just use IRT?
The prime reason, with which I agree, is that there is this 'mandatory' encryption field. Two things:
I have already polled the CERT community regarding the 'mandatory' for the key-cert attributes. As of today, I haven't heard anything which would prevent us from making those 'optional'.
The NCC has confirmed that the modification would be straight-forward (and cheap :-).
So this is solved, I think.
That is very good to hear as that is I think the main issue that some people where talking about. Can someone sum up the issues that are left with IRT's? Greets, Jeroen