I'm just going to go "+1" on that as I couldn't have said it any better. rgds, Sascha Luck On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:31:51PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:02:26PM +0100, denis wrote:
The requirement for role: objects is also annoying if all there is is just a single person - so admin-c:, tech-c: point to "the person that is responsible for everything", while abuse-c: needs a new object.
Please learn from past mistakes.
Yes, please *do so*. Do not design something that is going to win a price at a computer scientist conference - design something that is easy to work with.
The current abuse-c: design is annoying, because it requires extra work to get to the point of documenting what you want to document. So people (remember: we want *people* to use that, and put useful information in there) are annoyed, and stop bothering.
I'm a bit more verbose about this, but if you ever wondered *why* abuse-c: isn't the huge success people expected: this is part of the "why". It is way too annoying to use.
[..]
Maybe some extended outreach activity could be started to actually ensure that some human is alive at ERX holders that the NCC had no contact anymore since <x> years - but friendly, not pushy. They have been here first, we have no authority over them.
2007-01?
One of the early version of 2007-01 indeed covered legacy resource holders, and was killed in WG chairs last call - for precisely that reason. The final proposal that was accepted only covered resources given out by the RIPE NCC.
Precisely my point.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279