Hi Christian, * "Christian Rasmussen" <chr@jay.net> wrote:
Okay, this was discussed yesterday and we talked about a combination of what Daniel Karrenberg suggested and the above, meaning you just add an optional abuse attribute to the inetnum objects, if its not added the abuse address will "default" to the abuse address of the maintainer object. Wouldn't this work for you?
Yes, of course, that would be pretty okay.
Im not sure why it should be multiple? But I think most of us on this list can agree with you that a valid abuse email address associated with each inetnum in the database would be very welcome.
That's quite simple: I'd like to insert my customers abuse desk as well as my own abuse desk to at least keep track of any incidents. regards, sebastian -- whois: sabt-ripe - phone: +49 (0)160 90759764 email: sabt@sabt.net - pgp-pubkey: 0xD008DA9C