28 May
2025
28 May
'25
5:51 p.m.
On Wed, 28 May 2025 at 08:09, Sasha Romijn via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net> wrote: [...]
That does not sound practical to me. We should not end up with radically different layouts and validation rules for a role/person in the DB, depending on whether it is referenced from a tech-c or a zone-c. If we want to defer zone-c/abuse-c to other WGs, they should at least be involved early - I would prefer us to adjust role/person in a single change to a new set of requirements. It would be confusing to say to users "yes, your role object is valid, but you tried to use it in a zone-c, and you can't do that until you remove the signal contact attribute".
Good point! I think you are right. Thanks, Leo