As Tony already said we'd rather not do that right now to avoid valatility in database semantics. Please note that this will be fixed automatically and in a very general manner once the database goes classless!
Suggestion: The dom-net field is a "hint" field only. It does not hurt at all to list the whole network even if only part of it is used by the particular domain. One net can appear in several domain objects.
Daniel
In principle I agree, but to apply your suggestion we would have to change many entries which were written under the assumption that subnetworks were allowed in dom-net... We will rewrite dom-net: as remarks: dom-net: unless you can give us a piece of perl software (to put before the sintax checker) which converts from "subnet" to "whole net". Perl programmers are a very scarse resource here... ---------- ---------- Antonio_Blasco Bonito E-Mail: bonito@nis.garr.it GARR - Network Information Service c=it;a=garr;p=garr;o=nis;s=bonito c/o CNUCE - Istituto del CNR Tel: +39 (50) 593246 Via S. Maria, 36 Telex: 500371 CNUCE I 56126 PISA Italy Fax: +39 (50) 904052 ---------- ----------