Hi, On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 01:53:42PM -0700, Leo Vegoda wrote:
If there are good operational reasons for being more restrictive than is allowed for in RFC 5341 then we should not disregard those reasons for the sake of strict compliance with a very generous standard.
Is there? "Because someone once choose char(80) for the DB schema" does not truly sound like a "good operational reason", tbh. I do not feel strongly about this, so I won't argue either way, just pointing out that "varchar(255)" exists and in everything modern column widths are not using fixed disk space anymore :-) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279