7 Mar
2016
7 Mar
'16
1:14 p.m.
On 7 Mar 2016, at 11:30, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 07-Mar-2016, at 4:22 PM, Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie> wrote:
When you work that one out they can apply the same principle to "abuse-c:". Problem solved...
Pot, kettle, etc. /Niall
It still leaves this question Denis posed unanswered
How do you propose the NCC does that?
Other than abuse-c and a record cleanup.
I’m glad to see various people step up and reject abuse-c but is there a workable suggestion?
I think Peter Koch, Gert Doering, and Gilles Massen have answered this question adequately already. Best regards, Niall