Hi all, I'd like to suggest keeping the first listed one : 192.31.196.0/24 - AS112 and removing the 2nd (192.88.99.0/24) and the last (2011:4188::/48). probably "reserved" is not the right status for 192.31.196.0/24 [rfc7535] and https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv4-special-registry/iana-ipv4-specia... where the entry for 192.88.99.0/24 is much less favourable. https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-specia... seems to suggest to keep 2001::/32 and 2002::/16 Regards, Frank On 03/09/2021 03:58, Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wrote:
It seems that we never really settled the question of route objects that make reference to the following reserved IP blocks.
192.31.196.0/24 192.88.99.0/24
2001::/32 2002::/16 2011:4188::/48
Note that route objects referring to these IP blocks are *not* present in the route registries of any RIR other than RIPE.
I am in favor of including route objects that reference any of these reserved blocks in the ongoing cleanup. My recollection is that Cynthia Revstr�m also expressed support for including any and all such route objects in the current ongoing route object cleanup.
Are there any objections at the present time to including such route objects in the ongoing cleanup?
Regards, rfg