On 25 June 2015 at 21:42, Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:33:44PM +0200, George Michaelson wrote:
For your information, APNIC Hostmasters have moved to a mode of operation where for inetnum owners where the AS holder is not the same person, and a request is lodged with helpdesk for assistance, the hostmasters manually override and create the object for the inetnum holder, only removing it if an AS holder objects. The inetnum holder needs to be recognised in our systems.
Its a hand-mediated inetnum-only route object. Previous practice was to wait for explicit approval from the AS holder. Now, its created first, and withdrawn if there is an objection.
There have been no complaints. APNIC HM are considering portal changes and other process work to automate this.
What is the benefit of the hand-mediation?
Or is that just an artifact
of the software implementation?
Its an artefact of the s/w implementation. I imagine once they work out how to do this in the portal, this will be changed.
Does APNIC send a notification to the AS holder that an object was created in which they were referenced?
Yes. The following template is used: ====== Dear (ASN custodian), This is to inform you that the following route/route6 object has been registered in the APNIC Whois Database with your AS number referenced in the "origin" attribute. --- insert route object --- The IP addresses holder has asked that APNIC help register this route object in the APNIC Whois database. If you believe your AS number should not be referenced as the "origin" in this route object, please contact us by replying to this email. Kind Regards, ====== cheers -George
Kind regards,
Job