8 Apr
2004
8 Apr
'04
11:17 a.m.
On Apr 07, Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie> wrote:
The proposal from Randy and me is intended to offer a pragmatic, lightweight, and easily deployed means to advertise abuse contacts. Even if I disagree I can see why some people think that abuse-mailbox is a good idea, but I still see no reason why abuse-c would be easier to deploy and to use than mnt-irt.
Some people voiced objections over the mandatory use of encryption, but if perceived to be a problem this could be easily changed. What about trying to fix irt objects instead of complicating the database with multiple features with overlapping scope (irt, abuse-mailbox, abuse-c)? -- ciao, | Marco | [5612 qudenW7V5vzds]