Hi Tore,
I have to agree with this, so if I have understood everything what we are currently looking at is something like:
mntner: TEST1-MNT admin-c: TEST-RIPE auth: SSO-LIR no.foobar mnt-by: TEST1-MNT source: RIPE
mntner: TEST2-MNT admin-c: TEST-RIPE auth: SSO-LIR no.foobar group1 mnt-by: TEST2-MNT source: RIPE
mntner: TEST3-MNT admin-c: TEST-RIPE auth: SSO-LIR no.foobar group2 mnt-by: TEST3-MNT source: RIPE
Person 1 -> Access to TEST1-MNT Person 2 | group1 -> Access to TEST1-MNT, and TEST2-MNT Person 3 | group1, group2 -> Access to TEST1-MNT, TEST2-MNT, and TEST3-MNT
Is this what all of you are also thinking of?
The TEST1-MNT part of would cater for my use case.
The TEST2-MNT and TEST3-MNT parts of it are irrelevant to me (but I have no objections to such functionality per se).
In any case I would like to second Nick's comment about not being too prescriptive about how it ends up being implemented, though. As long as the basic desired functionality is provided for, I don't really care about how it ends up looking. The product owners and developers are in a better position to make those calls and I think we trust them to come up with the best solution.
+1 to all of the above. Same use-case, same feeling about Nick's comment :) Sander