Hello Sabine! On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 01:04:50PM +0200, Sabine Dolderer/Denic wrote:
We don't remove the maintainer scheme.
DENIC person/role objects don't have mnt-by attributes. All our contact objects of ourself and our customers are protected by our maintainer object in the RIPEdb. With implementation of the DENIC-<member>-<id> concept there is no maintainer at all. Just the DENIC member has modification rights to the handle object.
I want not to go too deeply in this discussion but believe me that it's not that easy.
Maybe. I'm not a lawyer. I'm just using "common sense" :-] Jens Hoffmann already corrected me in this regard.
If you go for a telefon you are explicitely ask if you want to have additionally to the telefonline a phonebook entry. If you refuse you still get the line.
Making phone: and fax: attributes optional is A Good Thing[tm], yes. But killing them altogether (and others like remarks: trouble: etc.), not.
RIPE-Meetings are open to everybody.
To all with money to spend for travelling around the globe, yes.
The minutes are published on the web.
I searched: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/archive/index.html and the lir-wg and db-wg homepages for information. I found none. Minutes from RIPE-35 are not yet available and RIPE-34 minutes revealed nothing. Am I missing something?
Maybe you can give me a hint where you think that these sort of discussions should take place.
In a public DENIC mailinglist (and perhaps db-wg), accessible for non-DENIC-members. There is none I would be aware of. Best regards, Daniel -- Entire Systems Network Operations Center noc@entire-systems.com Entire Systems GmbH - Ferbachstrasse 12 - 56203 Hoehr-Grenzhausen, Germany InterNIC-Handle: ES1238-ORG RIPE-Handle: ESN10-RIPE Tel: +49 2624 9550-55 GnuPG/PGP Key-ID: 0xBF3C40C9 http://www.entire-systems.com/noc/noc-key.asc GnuPG/PGP Fingerprint: 1F3F B675 1A38 D87C EB3C 6090 C6B9 DF48 BF3C 40C9