On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:52:30AM +0200, denis wrote: Denis
So how do they claim to be the owner? They change the details in the PERSON object, including the PERSON name, and maybe add their own MNTNER to it. But the key element here is the name. In the past you could not change the PERSON object name. This is a change that was implemented a couple of years ago and has led to this current issue. ONLY by changing the name of the PERSON object can you claim to be the 'owner' of this address space. If you can't change the name and you can't produce any ID to show you are the named person, then you have no claim over the address space. Hijacking in this way is not possible. So if you had rolled back that change to allow changes to the PERSON object name you would have fixed this problem.
Leaving aside rest of your email, this is plain wishful thinking. It is not a problem to find and pay/bribe someone with the same name to be a mere front man. Or change a name at some jurisdictions. Or marry someone and then change the name. This has been "invented" years ago. For those who understand a bit of polish, a cut from the well known polish commedy from 1980 with the same idea: https://youtu.be/ApLfbr89ssk?t=1m18s Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski@polsl.pl