On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Andres Petralli wrote: AP> > a.b.c.d/xx AP> > a.b.c.d 255.255.255.X AP> > a.b.c.d - w.x.y.z AP> > AP> > I do not care if the object created always contains: AP> > AP> > a.b.c.d - w.x.y.z AP> > AP> AP> Absolutely! It makes no sense that ripe changed to this dashed-only AP> notation. I would also very much appreciate if at least the slashed AP> notation would be re-introduced. This kind of notation is much more AP> common than the other one! AFAICC main problem with converting is that it should take place after PGP/GPG signature checks, but before validating and querying inetnum object from the DB... Engin, am I right? ;-) Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------