Re: [db-wg] Further cleanup (was: RIPE NONAUTH route(6) objects

In message <f77da251-97b8-8527-9ac6-cb06fc281255@interall.co.il>, Hank Nussbacher <hank@interall.co.il> wrote:

Thanks Ronald, but that doesn't answer my question. I was hoping to see route objects which reference *reserved* ASNs - not route objects for unallocated ASNs.

Hank, I'm frankly not sure what the value of such a sub-list would be. A bogon ASN is a bogon ASN, no? Do dues-paying members want to be underwriting the use of bogon ASNs by members whose ASN registrations have lapased due to non-payment of relevant annual fees? Regards, rfg