12 Jan
2004
12 Jan
'04
3:39 p.m.
On Jan 12, MarcoH <marcoh@marcoh.net> wrote:
If you define a abuse-c: as a person/role object, you still have the problem that people need to resolve it and then possibly get multiple addresses. So the problem doesn't get solved and we can just stick with the irt-object. Not if the relevant IRT object is automatically returned for every inetnum query. This is what ARIN does, BTW.
I think for this we can better stick to the most simple solution available. I think you should define better you requirements of simplicity...
-- ciao, | Marco | [4046 bascZNOGgkZo2]