On 11 May 2005, at 00:28, James A. T. Rice wrote:
Any chance of having changed: with a date (not an email address) back in the default output?
On 13 May 2005, at 10:56, James A. T. Rice wrote:
I'm curious to the arguements why this would be a bad thing.
If you're suggesting that the default method for displaying the 'changed' attribute should be something like changed: (e-mail-not-revealed) 20030929 rather than changed: hostmaster@ripe.net 20030929 I don't see any reason to "hope not", although this was actually my first reaction too, just like Hendrik Voelker. So, FMPOV, no "bad thing". OTOH, since -B gives full detail, I'm wondering about the arguments in favour of committing resources to its implementation. Is it such an outstandingly "good thing"? /Niall