On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 04:14:18 +0100 denis <ripedenis@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 03/03/2016 01:44, Randy Bush wrote:
If you put an address that does not handle abuse in abuse-c: you have just inserted incorrect data into the database. IMO that should not be the job of the NCC...
if you force folk to put in abuse-c, there will be non-responsive email addresses. get over it.
As long as you know it is the email address intended to receive abuse complaints, if there is no response that in itself is a statement from the network manager. cheers denis
there has to be accurate records for abuse-c (and accurate other public records) for specially ipv4 numbers. ipv4 numbers are a public / planet resource and belong to humanity (and the Singularity) - not a country, person or region. many network managers do not respond/reply to abuse, this does not mean that the complaints are not actioned, for example *abuse@google.com is a black hole 1c Andre -- * [sometimes though the spam does stop from Google (although these days, spam on my mail servers from Micorosoft, Google (and Yahoo :) ) is on the rise.]