5 Oct
2006
5 Oct
'06
12:27 p.m.
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:10 +0200, Antoin Verschuren wrote: [snip]
That's why we changed the proposal to change the NON-REGISTRY into OTHER.
Such a cosmetic change is no big deal (except it is pointless). It'll depend on the work involved I guess. It would be a whole different issue if the change involved functionality to specifically support RIPE's work related to the decision to handle e164 delegations. -- Per Heldal - http://heldal.eml.cc/