On Sep 10, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> wrote:
Many of these options are not mutually exclusive, i.e. it's probably a good idea, independently from implementing or not abuse-c, to make PGP attributes in IRT records optional and to make the email address in the changed attribute a free form string (it does not /need/ to reference a person object, as long as people in each organization can agree on what should be put there). Is anybody opposed to these changes?
Nope, changing the e-mail lines to person objects is probably wiser indeed. The whois interface could btw hide all the entries between the first and the last entry?
Why? If you do not want them to appear in the public database you just have to edit your object. -- ciao, | Marco | [7938 alwj72cVVwVrA]