Hi Denis, If we end up with option B, consider me interested in joining :) -Cynthia On Sun, Nov 8, 2020, 23:30 denis walker via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
Hi All
As Job said it is at an early discussion stage. If we do this using the NWI mechanism then the Problem statement and then a Solution definition will be discussed on the mailing list by anyone with an interest in this issue. Someone has to put forward a first draft for discussion.
Once these are agreed, we have three options: A-The RIPE NCC does the design and implementation B-A small group (Task Force?) of community people, with the RIPE NCC, does the design and implementation C-We have design by committee on the mailing list
Let's discuss the problem and solution ideas and then most likely option B is the way to move forward.
cheers denis co-chair DB-WG
On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 16:00, Job Snijders via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
Hi Cynthia,
The NRTM v4 initiative is in an awkward early stage where various parties (with *no* obligations towards each other!) are attempting to set the stage for the future existence of an inter-operable successor to the NRTM v3 protocol.
As indicated before, the nature of this call was informal, akin to a hallway meeting at a conference. Decisions about the RIPE NCC database are made on the db-wg@ipe.net mailing list. It was a courtesy to this group to indicate some volunteers would have a call to help progress things. You too were free to join. Hallway meetings are not recorded.
I'm interested to hear your opinions on-list or off-list! :-)
Kind regards,
Job
On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 10:36:43AM +0100, Cynthia Revström wrote:
I would like to see more here on the mailing list, so I would request
that
any future calls be recorded and published.
I have opinions on this subject and I don't think me missing the call should leave me out of the loop.
- Cynthia
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 11:31 Stavros Konstantaras < stavros.konstantaras@ams-ix.net> wrote:
Hi Cynthia,
Yes the call happened and the problem description is almost ready. Soon will be published here in the mailing list so the DB-WG chairs can officially create a new NWI and submit it to RIPE NCC developers
Thank you for your support and your interest on that :)
Best regards,
Stavros Konstantaras | Sr. Network Engineer | AMS-IX M +31 (0) 620 89 51 04 | T +31 20 305 8999 ams-ix.net
On 6 Nov 2020, at 02:51, Cynthia Revström via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
I also support creating a new NWI for a modernized NRTM like service.
- Cynthia
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020, 02:50 Cynthia Revström, <me@cynthia.re> wrote:
Hi Job,
Was there a call about this yet?
And if so, was there any outcome?
- Cynthia
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, 20:38 Job Snijders via db-wg, <db-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:30:28PM +0100, denis walker wrote: > I would suggest we create NWI-12 to move forward with a new version of > NRTM. Perhaps you could write the first draft of the problem > statement?
Given that more people than just myself were engaged with this subject so far... maybe Stavros, Emil, a DB-WG chair, myself and any other interested parties can have a 1 hour group phone call to formulate an updated problem statement for NWI-12?
Perhaps next week, November 4th, 15:00 UTC? Consider it a "hallway chat", not something formal. The chairs can report back to the mailing list.
Kind regards,
Job