29 Nov
2000
29 Nov
'00
4:53 p.m.
At 12:25 PM 29/11/2000, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
=The same rule should apply to all assignments. If a (home) network =contact person doesn't want to be 'listed', s/he can try to live =without real network and buy NAT from a provider.
That's a very valid point.
I don't agree. There should not have to be a tradeoff between IP address and privacy... you should not be forced to use NAT simply to protect your phone number. I think that the original solution of listing the provider is a good real-world workaround. -- Alex French Consultant, Technical Services E: afrench@vianetworks.com VIA NET.WORKS, Inc. T: +353 86 818 8118