Hi Aleksi

Here we discuss the semantics of how the database applies the logic for route object creation. If you want to discuss the logic, I suggest you move over to the routing-wg and talk with other routing experts :)

cheers

denis

co-chair DB-WG

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 14:52, Aleksi Suhonen <ripe-ml-2024@ssd.axu.tm> wrote:

Hi and thanks for getting back so quickly,

Route objects are supposed to be ships in the night. I guess we need to
start a new PDP so that only the inetnum* mnt-* fields affect the
creation of new route* objects. Changing and deleting existing route*
objects should continue to use their own maintainer fields.

Kind Regards,

On 15/04/2024 15:42, denis walker wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> It is not unintended behaviour or a bug. It is by design. See
> https://apps.db.ripe.net/docs/Authorisation/Protection-of-Route-Object-Space/#authorisation-rules-for-creating-route-objects <https://apps.db.ripe.net/docs/Authorisation/Protection-of-Route-Object-Space/#authorisation-rules-for-creating-route-objects>
>
> There used to be a flow chart showing this but I can't find it now.
>
> cheers
> denis
> co-chair DB-WG
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 13:55, Cynthia Revström via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net
> <mailto:db-wg@ripe.net>> wrote:
>
>     The same thing occurs if there's a less specific route(6) object.
>
>     I would suspect that this is probably unintended behaviour?
>
>     -Cynthia
>
>     On Mon, 15 Apr 2024, 13:12 Aleksi Suhonen via db-wg, <db-wg@ripe.net
>     <mailto:db-wg@ripe.net>> wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         When migrating a route from one ASN to another, the best
>         practice is to
>         create a second route(6) object for it with the new origin. The
>         creation
>         of the new object is dependent on the "mnt-routes:" field of the
>         enclosing inetnum(6) object.
>
>         Am I correct thus far?
>
>         Because I'm running into an issue. When trying to create a new
>         route
>         object using the LIR portal, I'm getting an error that the route
>         is not
>         authenticated by the maintainer of _the other_ route object.
>
>         Am I missing something obvious, or have I found a bug/regression?
>
>         BR,
>
>         --
>                  Aleksi Suhonen
>
>                  () ascii ribbon campaign
>                  /\ support plain text e-mail
>
>         --
>
>         To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder,
>         or change your subscription options, please visit:
>         https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
>         <https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg>
>
>     --
>
>     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or
>     change your subscription options, please visit:
>     https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
>     <https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg>
>

--
        Aleksi Suhonen

        () ascii ribbon campaign
        /\ support plain text e-mail

--

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg