- db-wg - mailman.ripe.net

RIPE53 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1
by Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet 14 Sep '06

14 Sep '06

Dear DB-WG folks, Chairpersons, Meeting-Role! This is the 1st draft of an agenda for the DB-WG at RIPE52 in Amsterdam - 1st week of October 2006. Changes since V.: ---. For time slot allocations please refer to the most up-to-date meeting plan at http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-53/meeting-plan.html Please note that, for our convenience, the time slot map becomes clickable for those sessions which have already submitted a (draft) agenda. Best regards, Wilfried. ________________________________________________________________________ A. Administrative Matters - scribe (Nigel T.) - list of participants - agenda - approval of minutes - review of action list - "remote participation" coordination (if needed) B. Data Base Update (N.N., RIPE NCC) [~30 min] . major developments like the IRT changes,... . DB support for glue records and ENUM delegations . ASN32, etc. C. Task-Force on Data Protection Issues (Jochen d. R. RIPE NCC) [~15 min] D. Proposal to retire CRYPT-PW (Peter K., denic.de + WW144) [~15 min] E. Update on the Poetry Object (Nigel T.) [~10 min] . Processes for updating Poetic forms Y. Input from other WGs Z. AOB

1 0

Announcement Routing Registry Training Courses
by RIPE NCC Training Services 29 Aug '06

29 Aug '06

Dear Colleagues The RIPE NCC Training Services Department invites you to register for one of our upcoming Routing Registry Training Courses: Date: Friday 1 September 2006 Time: 0900 - 1700 Location: Reykjavik, Iceland AND Date: Thursday 26 October 2006 Time: 0900 - 1700 Location: London, United Kingdom AND Date: Friday 4 November 2006 Time: 0900 - 1700 Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands AND Date: Monday 27 November 2006 Time: 0900 - 1700 Location: Rome, Italy Hosted by: CASPUR http://www.caspur.it/ Hosted by: NAMEX http://www.namex.it/ The main objective of the "Routing Registry Training Course" is to familiarise the LIRs with the features of the Routing Registry, while introducing the relevant tools and services of the RIPE NCC. The course also offers practical exercises. OVERVIEW OF TOPICS COVERED IN THE COURSE: - Routing Registry as a part of the RIPE Whois Database and the Internet Routing Registry (IRR) - Specifying routing policies using (RPSL) Routing Policy Specification Language and the RtConfig tool - IRRToolSet - Routing Information Service (RIS) - Routing Registry Consistency Check Project Please note that this is an advanced course. It will: - NOT teach the basics of routing - NOT teach the basics of RIPE Database operations - NOT describe how to receive Internet resources from the RIPE NCC - NOT describe how to operate a Local Internet Registry (LIR) The target audience of the course are technical staff of LIRs: e.g. network operators, engineers etc. This course is not intended for administrative or management staff (e.g. Hostmasters) . It is assumed that all attendees will be familiar with Border Gateway Protocol routing and with the RIPE Database (i.e. creating/modifying objects). This course is based on interactive exercises in a local network set-up. Please bring your laptops equipped with the following: - A working Ethernet card, - Three meters of Ethernet cable, - A secure connection client, - A web browser. Please be prepared to share your laptop (or at least allow another attendee to "look over your shoulder") if necessary. The course is free of charge. We provide lunch and printed training materials. We do not cover any of your travel expenses or accommodation. We give all of our training courses in English. You can find more information about the course at: http://www.ripe.net/training/rr/ How to register: --------------------- You can register up to two people from your LIR for each course. (If there are places left nearer the time of the course, you can register more people). To register for this course, you can either use the LIR Portal at: https://lirportal.ripe.net/lirportal/training/course-list.html Or the online registration form on our website: http://www.ripe.net/cgi-bin/trainingform.pl.cgi If you have any questions, send an e-mail to <training(a)ripe.net>. Kind regards, Rumy Kanis Training Services Manager RIPE NCC

1 0

re: Proposal for returning IRT objects
by Denis Walker 17 Aug '06

17 Aug '06

[Apologies for duplicate mails] Dear Colleagues, The RIPE NCC has re-implemented the way IRT objects are returned in RIPE Database query results. The proposal can be found at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/db-wg/2006/msg00087.html The first stage of this implementation as described in the proposal is now complete. The main objectives were to: - Increase the availability of the IRT information to users - Promote the use of the IRT object - Make it easier for third party tool writers to find the correct contacts New Behaviour ------------------------ The behaviour of the "-c" flag and the "-rc" flag is as follows: A standard query for address space including the "-c" query flag returns the queried INETNUM and related objects. This also includes an IRT object referenced by the queried INETNUM object or the closest, less specific INETNUM object, if one exists. It will also still include any ROUTE objects. By using the "-rc" flags, the related personal objects are filtered out. The IRT object will still be returned together with any ROUTE objects. An additional consequence of this change is the way the "-b" flag works. The "-b" flag will always return the primary key of any address space object queried. It also returns the "abuse-mailbox:" attributes from the address space object and any related IRT objects. The RIPE Database Query webpage has also been updated: http://www.ripe.net/fcgi-bin/whois For all address space queries made via this webpage, the "-c" flag will be added, making it the default. This only occurs if no other address space query flags (lLmMxbc) are present. A link has also been added to enable users to switch between the test and production databases. This makes it easier to query the RIPE Test Database. Regards Denis Walker Software Engineering Department RIPE NCC

1 0

The RIPE Database and DNS management system has been updated
by Katie Petrusha 03 Aug '06

03 Aug '06

Dear Colleagues, We have updated the RIPE Database and DNS management system to implement several new features. The change in the RIPE Database: - There is a new syntax for the "nserver:" attribute in the DOMAIN object to support IPv4 and IPv6 glue name servers. The changes in the DNS management system: - The management of DNS delegation in the e164.arpa (ENUM) zone has been brought under the same provisioning system as reverse DNS management. - The Delegation Checker has been updated to support glue name servers for IPv4 and IPv6 - The Web Zone Delegation Checker has also been updated You can find more details about the proposal for implementation at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/dns-wg/2006/msg00128.html -- Katie Petrusha RIPE NCC

1 0

RIPE Database maintenance
by Denis Walker 03 Aug '06

03 Aug '06

Dear Colleagues, We will carry out maintenance work on the RIPE Database update server, cello.ripe.net, on Friday, 4 August 2006 between 09:00-10:00 (UTC). During this period, you may experience outages when trying to use the following services: - RIPE Database updates (including the web interface and synchronous interface) - Queries to our mirrored databases (using -a query flag) Any updates sent to the mail interface will be queued and processed later. We apologise for any inconvenience. If you have any questions, please contact: ripe-dbm(a)ripe.net. Regards, Denis Walker Software Engineering Department RIPE NCC

1 0

Re: [db-wg] crypted password
by Max Tulyev 25 Jul '06

25 Jul '06

Markus Werner wrote: > Migration steps. > > - Move all auth: MD5-PW to a new md5-pw object and reference them. > > - At some day it is possible to say that md5-pw are obsolet and deny > creation of new objects. So new users get forced to use a other method. > > - After time you can force users to update the auth method everytime > they need to edit an object. Nice. But seems too soft, and it takes a long time to migrate... My view: - Implement md5-pw object in database - Autocreate md5-pw objects for all existing md5 passwords - Autochange hashed passwords with md5-pw objects - Include "remark: see http://... for what's happened" in chaned objects Like it was in person/org objects when russian area phone codes was changed. -- WBR, Maxim V. Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@FIDO)

3 2

crypted password
by Max Tulyev 25 Jul '06

25 Jul '06

Hi! Why not to hide crypted password in mntner objects from public queries? It is so easy to crack now. -- WBR, Maxim V. Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@FIDO)

6 10

Proposal to change the syntax of "nserver:" attribute
by Katie Petrusha 11 Jul '06

11 Jul '06

[Apologies for duplicate mails] Motivation: We plan to automate management of DNS delegation in the e164.arpa zone (ENUM). The provisioning system, with the RIPE Database as a front end, must support IPv6 glue records. It must also implement complete and consistent IPv4 glue record support. This will mean making changes to the RIPE Database syntax so that it specifies the glue record and update the delegation checks. This proposal covers that syntax. Proposal: We suggest changing the syntax of the "nserver:" attribute in DOMAIN objects as follows: nserver: [domain_name] /or/ nserver: [domain_name] [ipv4_address] /or/ nserver: [domain_name] [ipv6_address] where [domain_name] is the fully qualified DNS name of the name server without a trailing "." [ipv4_address] is an IPv4 address of the name server [ipv6_address] is an IPv6 address of the name server If [domain_name] is followed by an IP address, it must be inside the zone that is being delegated. Any level of a glue name is supported within the valid domain name syntax. Multiple name server lines will need to be used to specify multiple IP addresses for the same hostname. Examples: The following values would be allowed: domain: example.com nserver: ns1.test.net 168.0.0.1 nserver: ns1.test.net 0::0 nserver: ns1.example.com nserver: ns1.d1.example.com All other variants of the values will be rejected. End-of-line comments starting with '#' will be still allowed. Consequences for existing objects: We will not automatically modify any existing objects. Instead we suggest notifying the maintainers of objects that do not comply with the proposed syntax. This will cover around 150 objects. Consequences for the delegation checks: DNS checks applicable to glue records will be added to the Zone Delegation Checker (http://www.ripe.net/rs/reverse/delcheck/delcheck_descr.html) -- Katie Petrusha RIPE NCC

10 16

Re: Need help with ripe-dbase-2.3
by Denis Walker 10 Jul '06

10 Jul '06

Dear Alex Unfortunately version 2 of the RIPE Database code was taken out of production more than 5 years ago. We have archives of the code but no one at the RIPE NCC works on it now. I am sorry but we are unable to assist you with this problem. I have copied this email to the Database Working Group in case some one in the community can assist you. Maybe there are others still running this version of the code. Regards Denis Walker Software Engineering Department RIPE NCC Alex Moura wrote: > Hello, > > We have been using the ripe-dbase-2.3 sucessfully on a server with > perl-5.00503, but now we are having problems to make it run on a new > server with perl-5.8.8. > The server runs, but dies after sucessfully replying a query, > recording only this error message: > > File: (...)/db-root/log/err/errlog > Fatal error: accept failed: No child processes PID: 98560 > > I'd like to know if this code would work with perl-5.8. I will try to > run it with perl-5.6.2, as it seem to be the oldest version od perl > available at the FreeBSD ports. > > We know this code is old, but I'm hopeful to have some answer about > this issue, once we have made some customizations to fufill our > organization needs, and we'd like to avoid - at least for now - having > to port these customizations to the most recent ripe-dbase code. > > Thank you in advance, > > Alex

1 0

2006-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (LIR-PARTITIONED status for IPv6)
by Filiz Yilmaz 06 Jul '06

06 Jul '06

PDP Number: 2006-03 LIR-PARTITIONED status for IPv6 Dear Colleagues The proposal 2006-03, LIR-PARTITIONED status for IPv6 has been withdrawn. The proposer decided that the proposal was no longer necessary. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/archive/ Regards Filiz Yilmaz RIPE NCC Policy Development Officer

1 0