October 2014 - db-wg - mailman.ripe.net

<auto-dbm@ripe.net> is slow this afternoon.
by RIPE Database Administration 16 May '18

16 May '18

Dear Colleagues, Because of a very high level of use this afternoon, the response time of <auto-dbm(a)ripe.net> is longer than normal. I have made contact with those who are responsible and I expect the situation to improve as the machine works through the queue. Please be patient. Obviously we at the RIPE NCC Database Group are continuously working to make the performance of the database as good as possible. However, we cannot make improvements in zero time. We thank you for your co-operation up to now and we ask for your continued co-operation so that everyone receives the best possible service. If you have anymore questions, please contact <ripe-dbm(a)ripe.net>. Regards, Ambrose Magee ____________________________ RIPE Database Administration.

2 2

RIPE Database Release 1.76 Deployed to Release Candidate Environment
by Tim Bruijnzeels 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Dear colleagues, The RIPE NCC is pleased to announce the deployment of RIPE Database software release 1.76 to the Release Candidate (RC) environment. Detailed information about features, changes and how this release might affect your operations, are available in the release notes: https://www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/release-notes/ripe-database-release-1.76 This release includes many small bug fixes and feature improvements. Notably, we have addressed the following issues: - Issue #221: It is now possible to change the name of a PERSON or ROLE object - Issue #256: Abuse contact information is now shown when using web lookups - Issue #220: Failed update notifications now include a diff of the attempted change A number of users requested the notification of a failed update to include a diff showing what was attempted to be changed. A consequence of this change is that, if you mistype the password pseudo-attribute (eg "pasword: clear_password"), the notification will include your clear text password. This is a good time for all maintainers of data in the RIPE Database to review to whom these notifications are sent. The "upd-to:" attribute in a MNTNER object should only include the email address of a person or team in your organisation who deals with security issues. If this team receives such a notification, they should advise the user to change their password. We invite all users of the RIPE Database to review the new release in the RC environment: https://www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/release-notes/rc-release-candidate-envir… We look forward to any questions or comments you might have. Kind regards, Tim Bruijnzeels Assistant Manager Software Engineering RIPE NCC

3 3

RIPE69 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1
by Wilfried Woeber 05 Nov '14

05 Nov '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear DB-WG folks, Chairpersons, "Meeting"! This is the 1st -rough- draft of an agenda for the DB-WG Meeting at RIPE69 in London. For time slot allocations please refer to the most up-to-date meeting plan at https://ripe69.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/ The DB-WG Meeting is scheduled for *Thursday*, November 6th, starting at 16:00 local time[1], after the coffee break. The length of our timeslot is 90 Minutes. The overall (draft) RIPE 69 meeting outline is already available at https://ripe69.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/ Please feel free to propose additional topics to be discussed! I'd also suggest that you submit your points of view regarding the topics on the proposed agenda on the mailing list, preferably before the WG meeting's start :-) Best regards, hope to see you soon in London, Wilfried. PS: thanks to Job and Piotr for suggesting items! [1] for remote participation, this 15:00 UTC ________________________________________________________________________ A. Administrative Matters . Welcome . select scribe (thanks to Nigel for volunteering again!) . finalise agenda . approval of minutes from previous WG meeting(s) . review of action list B. Data Base Operational Update (N.N., RIPE NCC, t.b.c.) C. New DB-Software functionality (proposed, test, deployment) . referral-by deprecation - (based on deprecation guidelines) - present time table for 'referral-by' . from "changed:" to "last-modified:" / "created:" - explain new attr., examples, - timeline for implementation D: Personalised authentication? E: Maintainer Password resets? X. Working Group Management [~10 min] . chair replacement procedure . WW144 to resign . new DB-WG Chairs to take over Y. Input from other Working Groups and/or Task Forces Z. AOB __________________________________________ 2014-10-21 19:15 UTC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) iQCVAwUBVEazMt/RXX7wrLNpAQK3xQQAutAXz+LcI53fGT4dmNbfSyDGuc10RQLG S3liIaKCwRgLg0sKSkInShdHjE8zIINdN4WGwZ1EECTfEahzYilmau9jgfxWy3E9 vx3QRtQ9iXDd43CvyUDjOW09j1g2CfTlXCx8oEJaM9oULihGte3ECRzn9Acvptl0 3UuUmikSt3s= =5Rjx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 3

Draft minutes of RIPE 67 meeting
by Nigel Titley 05 Nov '14

05 Nov '14

Please find draft minutes of the DB-WG meeting held in Athens today. Comments, complaint, misrepresentations etc, to me Nigel

1 1

WG chair selection procedure
by Nigel Titley 28 Oct '14

28 Oct '14

Folks We need to have a documented procedure in place by the end of the next WG meeting for the affirmation and re-affirmation of WG chairs. I strongly feel that voting has no place in the running of RIPE working groups and also feel that inability to attend a RIPE meeting should not be a barrier to either becoming a chair or participating in the selection process. So I propose the following procedure. 1. A call for interested parties is made on the WG mailing list at yearly intervals 2. Interested parties have 2 weeks to make their interest known, again on the mailing list 3. The DB-WG chairs issue a call for discussion as per normal. WG members express their approval or otherwise of the presented candidates. 4. After two weeks the chairs declare consensus as they would do for a policy proposal I would propose a maximum number of 3 co-chairs. If at the end of the discussion phase there are more than 3 proposed co-chairs then a call is made for any of the candidates to withdraw. If there are still more than 3 candidates then names are put into a hat and the first three names drawn from the hat will take on the role of chairs for the next 12 months. Comments are welcome. Best regards Nigel

5 5

Call for agenda items, DB-WG Meeting during RIPE69, London, UK
by Wilfried Wöber 14 Oct '14

14 Oct '14

Dear DB-WG folks, this is a _call for agenda items for the meeting of the DataBase-WG during RIPE69 in London, UK, November 3 - 7, 2014 Please submit (to the WG list!) your item requests and|or suggest topics for discussion to be included in the draft agenda! Please note that the DataBase-WG meeting is *at the moment* scheduled for *Thursday*, Nov. 6 (starting at 16:00 local time). This is according to the *draft* meeting plan - which is pretty stable already, but may still need to be changed as we get closer to the meeting date! The overall (draft) RIPE 68 meeting outline is already available at https://ripe69.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/ Looking forward to a successful meeting and see you soon in London! Wilfried.

1 0

Revised RIPE Database Documentation on www.ripe.net
by Denis Walker 07 Oct '14

07 Oct '14

Dear colleagues, Earlier this year, the RIPE NCC announced our intentions to revise the RIPE Database documentation, as requested by the community at RIPE Meetings: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/fatemah_mafi/revising-the-ripe-database-docum… The first batch of new documentation pages are available online: https://www.ripe.net/data-tools/support/ripe-database-documentation These pages replace the contents of the RIPE Database Update Reference Manual, which has now been removed fromwww.ripe.net, and include the contents of several other database-related webpages. We will publish further documentation pages, replacing the RIPE Database Query Reference Manual, before RIPE 69 in London, 3-7 November 2014. Features of this new documentation include: - A glossary of commonly-used terms shown throughout the documentation marked by dots (...) underneath. Mousing over these words will show the corresponding glossary entry. Alternatively, you can browse the glossary for a list of words and phrases and their definitions. - An export feature so that you can export the entire contents of the documentation to a .pdf for printing. We invite feedback from the community about the new documentation, which will be revised with each release of the RIPE Database software. Please reply toripe-dbm(a)ripe.net or provide your feedback on the RIPE Database Working Group mailing list. Regards, Denis Walker RIPE NCC

1 0

Revers DNS
by Colin Pyne 07 Oct '14

07 Oct '14

Hello, Please can anyone offer any advice as to what I am doing wrong in the setup of my revers DNS zone? I am getting two error messages when I submit the domain via webupdates. * No name servers found at child. No name servers could be found at the child. This usually means that the child is not configured to answer queries about the zone. * Fatal error in delegation for zone 38.57.185.in-addr.arpa. No name servers found at child or at parent. No further testing can be performed. Object data domain 38.57.185.in-addr.arpa descr Reverse DNS for LCH admin-c CP9084-RIPE tech-c CP9084-RIPE zone-c CP9084-RIPE nserver lchns1.unlimitednameservers.com nserver lchns2.unlimitednameservers.com mnt-by MOTIVE-MNT changed colin.pyne(a)motive.co.uk 20141007 source RIPE I have looked at this https://www.ripe.net/data-tools/dns/reverse-dns/how-to-set-up-reverse-deleg… I can perform a zone lookup 38.57.185.in-addr.arpa using NSLOOKUP > server 185.57.38.1 Default Server: host-185-57-38-1.lowcosthosting.co.uk Address: 185.57.38.1 > set type=ns > 38.57.185.in-addr.arpa Server: host-185-57-38-1.lowcosthosting.co.uk Address: 185.57.38.1 38.57.185.in-addr.arpa nameserver = lchns2.unlimitednameservers.com 38.57.185.in-addr.arpa nameserver = lchns1.unlimitednameservers.com lchns1.unlimitednameservers.com internet address = 185.57.38.1 lchns2.unlimitednameservers.com internet address = 185.57.38.2 Any advice would be very appreciated. Regards, Colin Pyne Colin Pyne | IT Manager T: 01539 797464 E: Colin.Pyne(a)motive.co.uk Visit our website: www.motivetechnology.com<http://www.motivetechnology.com/> Credentials & Partnerships [http://www.motivetechnology.com/MotiveTechnology/media/Motive/email/sponsor…] Lets Connect [http://www.motivetechnology.com/MotiveTechnology/media/Motive/email/motiveB…] <http://www.motivetechnology.com/Blog> [http://www.motivetechnology.com/MotiveTechnology/media/Motive/email/motiveF…] <https://www.facebook.com/motivetechnologyUK> [http://www.motivetechnology.com/MotiveTechnology/media/Motive/email/motiveT…] <https://twitter.com/Team_Motive_UK> [http://www.motivetechnology.com/MotiveTechnology/media/Motive/email/motiveL…] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/motive-technology-uk-limited> The content of this message and attached file are confidential and / or privileged and are for the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, any unauthorised review, use, re-transmission, dissemination, copying, disclosure or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error please contact the sender immediately and then delete this email from your system. Copyright in this email and attachments created by us belongs to Motive Technology UK Limited . Any attachment with this message should be checked for viruses before it is opened. Motive Technology UK Limited cannot be held responsible for any failure by the recipient to test for viruses before opening any attachments. Should you communicate with anyone at Motive Technology UK Limited by email you consent to us monitoring and reading any such correspondence. Motive Technology UK Limited - Company No: 06813205 - Registration Number: 947 4034 15 Registered Office: Richard House, Winckley Square, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 3HP

2 1

Proposal to remove "referral-by" attribute in "mntner" object or make it optional
by Martin Tõnusoo 06 Oct '14

06 Oct '14

Hello, "referral-by" attribute(defined in RFC2725) is mandatory in "mntner" object: [martint@ ~/ripe-db]$ whois -BHrh whois.ripe.net -t mntner | grep referral-by referral-by: [mandatory] [single] [ ] [martint@ ~/ripe-db]$ I checked the db-wg mailing-list archive since January 2000 and only discussion I found regarding this attribute was from Engin Gunduz(former RIPE NCC Senior Software Engineer) in June 2004: [martint@ ~/ripe-db]$ for year in {2000..2014}; do for month in January February March April May June July August September October November December; do wget -q --no-check-certificate https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/$(printf '%s-%s.txt.gz\n' "$year" "$month"); done; done [martint@ ~/ripe-db]$ zgrep -Hi "referral-by" * 2000-August.txt.gz:-irb (or -ireferral-by) <maintainer name> 2000-August.txt.gz:Returns all objects whose referral-by attribute matches the query 2001-August.txt.gz:referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2001-May.txt.gz:If you mean referral-by, it points to mntner handle, mandatory in mntner 2003-April.txt.gz:referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2003-April.txt.gz:referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2003-August.txt.gz:> referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2003-December.txt.gz: referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz: referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz: referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz: referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz: referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz:> referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz:> referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz:> > referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz:> > referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-July.txt.gz:referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2004-April.txt.gz:referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2004-June.txt.gz:referral-by: [mandatory] [single] [inverse key] 2004-June.txt.gz:referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2004-June.txt.gz:Subject: [db-wg] Proposed Change 2004.2: Removal of "referral-by:" Attribute 2004-June.txt.gz:[2004.2] Removal of "referral-by:" Attribute from the MNTNER Object 2004-June.txt.gz:Remove the "referral-by:" attribute from the MNTNER objects' schema. This 2004-June.txt.gz:The "referral-by:" attribute was introduced into MNTNER objects when the 2004-June.txt.gz:"referral-by:" is defined in RFC2725: 2004-June.txt.gz: referral-by This attribute is required in the maintainer object. It 2004-June.txt.gz: referral-by. An auth-override can only be added to a maintainer 2004-June.txt.gz: those identified by the maintainer in the referral-by have 2004-June.txt.gz: "referral-by" attribute is now mandatory in the "maintainer" object 2004-June.txt.gz: referenced by a "referral-by" attribute elsewhere. 2004-June.txt.gz:The RIPE NCC introduced the "referral-by:" attribute as a place-holder, 2004-May.txt.gz:referral-by: [mandatory] [single] [inverse key] 2005-May.txt.gz:> referral-by: [mandatory] [single] [inverse key] 2005-May.txt.gz:> > referral-by: [mandatory] [single] [inverse key] 2005-November.txt.gz:>referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2005-November.txt.gz:> >referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2005-November.txt.gz:> > >referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2007-July.txt.gz:> referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2007-July.txt.gz:>> referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2007-June.txt.gz: referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2007-June.txt.gz: referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2007-June.txt.gz:> referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2007-June.txt.gz:> referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2012-April.txt.gz:referral-by: DEV-ROOT-MNT 2013-March.txt.gz:referral-by: TRUBNIKOV-MNT 2013-March.txt.gz:> referral-by: TRUBNIKOV-MNT 2013-March.txt.gz:> referral-by: TRUBNIKOV-MNT 2013-March.txt.gz:>> referral-by: TRUBNIKOV-MNT 2013-March.txt.gz:>>> referral-by: TRUBNIKOV-MNT [martint@ ~/ripe-db]$ He also proposed to remove the "referral-by" attribute, but there was no feedback to his e-mail. One can read his e-mail here: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2004-June/002797.html In addition, while RIPE database manual says that "referral-by attribute may never be altered after the addition of the maintainer", one can easily change it at least in current RIPE database version. Is the "referral-by" attribute obsolete? Or is it needed in some specific situation? If not, I propose to remove the "referral-by" attribute in "mntner" object or at least make it optional. WBR, Martin Tonusoo -------------------------- LINXTELECOM www.linxtelecom.com -------------------------- NOC 24/7: +372 622 3300

13 25